2011년 4월 12일 화요일

Cohabitation in Korea.

  Monday morning, Jung-min and Sang-chul presented about Cohabitation before marriage in Korea. In our country, recently many problems are happening due to cohabitation before marriage. To live together former marriage is very argumentative issue and accompanied by a lot of opinions. So, my opinionof this subject is the opposite.
 
 First, cohabitants may get hurt on the impulse of the moment. To know spouses’ tendency after promising marriage doesn’t make problems. But, if people cohabitdue to effect of media or just economic aspects, they will have little emotional band and responsibility.
 
 Second, cohabitants can’t be protected by law. Finland or in some other European countries are supporting cohabitation and have law which protects them. However, in our country which has a strong conservative inclination, not only law for cohabitants doesn’t exist but also people look them discriminatorily.
 
 Lastly, there are many cases of marry after pregnancy, but breaking up after pregnancy is more than those because they feel less responsibility. Therefore, rate of single mothers and abortion cannot help increasing. Also, Korea doesn’t have many facilities for single mother. These problems are one of the most serious things in our society.
 
 I agree that cohabitation assuming marriage is good, but cohabitation can cause social and personal problems. In conclusion, we refrain from cohabitation as possible as and government should make law for cohabitants.

댓글 3개:

  1. I agee with your opinion. Cohabitation is good means before marriage unless abuse. Also goverment should make law for cohabitants like France.

    답글삭제
  2. I am with you. You are right. If marry after pregnancy is getting serious. We might have little responsibility. And there is nothing that can`t be protected by law for cohabitants. Then, it will cause many social problems. So, I disagree with cohabitants before marriage.

    답글삭제
  3. I think people who decided cohavitation are not young. They are adult so they must have the responsibility of their action. That's why the government doesn;t need to make the law about that.

    답글삭제